1. The Defendant’s service payment claim based on the judgment of 2013Gahap9475 decided January 10, 2014 against the Plaintiffs is 154.

Basic Facts

On November 26, 2008, the Defendant concluded an agency agreement with D Housing Redevelopment Project Promotion Committee (hereinafter “instant Promotion Committee”) to support all business affairs and lend operating expenses to the Defendant so that the instant Promotion Committee can obtain approval for establishment, and the Plaintiffs, E, F, and G (hereinafter “Plaintiffs, etc.”) jointly guaranteed the instant Promotion Committee’s obligations as its executive officers.

Plaintiff

A on February 5, 2010, at par value 200 million won, issuance date February 5, 2010, and on August 5, 2010, a promissory note notarial deed (No. 41, 2010) issued by a notary public, and lent KRW 200 million to the Defendant (hereinafter “the first loan”) (hereinafter “the same year”).

9. 8. On October 14, 201 of the same year, a notary public borrowed KRW 100 million upon receipt of a promissory note No. 283 by the Defendant on September 8, 201, the date of issuance, and October 8, 2011 (No. 2010), and leased KRW 150 million to the Defendant (hereinafter “second loan”); and on October 14, 2010, the date of issuance of a promissory note No. 1320, Apr. 13, 201 (No. 322, 2010 by a notary public) as a notary public on April 13, 201.

(hereinafter referred to as “third lending” and combined loans 1, 2, and 3. Plaintiff A lent the instant loan to the Defendant from H.

The defendant on October 14, 2010 and the same year with respect to loans to the plaintiff A on October 5, 2010.

8.5.As the agreement, each 12 million won was paid in full, with an additional repayment of 24 million won on January 20, 2012.

The Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiffs, etc. seeking service costs under the instant service contract, and this Court rendered a ruling as to January 10, 2014 as “the Plaintiff, etc.” as “No. 9475,” etc.