The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is working for the agricultural branch of the Chang-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Jinhae-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City C in Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

As a person who was temporarily laid off from February 2011, no person may demand a person working for a financial company, etc. to provide transaction information, etc.;

A. On December 16, 201, the Defendant, within the scope of 112-503 Dong-dong building D, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and within the scope of 112-dong 503, the Defendant, after-work G (32 years of age, female) who worked at the Nonghyup F branch located in the Chang-si, Chang-si, Jin-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, requested a victim H (40 years of age, male) who is his husband, to provide transaction information, etc., and provided the victim H’s comprehensive customer information inquiry (individual) and the received information inquiry by G.

B. On December 22, 2011, the Defendant was provided with the aforementioned method within the I Hospital Hospital Hospital Hospital Hospital located in the Gyeongnam-si, Changwon-si, Seoul, and then received from the next G with respect to the Customer H’s comprehensive information inquiry (individual) and the Receiving Information Inquiry.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. A H statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article on criminal facts, Articles 6 (1) and 4 (1) of the Act on Real Name Financial Transactions and Guarantee of Secrecy, and Selection of fines;

1. A fine not exceeding 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act provides that if there is no criminal history record against the defendant, or if it is necessary to pay the balance of apartment houses purchased jointly with the spouse prior to the divorce, it is reasonable to consider that the request was made to the subsequent owner of the financial company for the provision of the financial transaction information under the name of the spouse. At the