Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 25, 2013, at around 23:30 on December 25, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed assault to the victim, who is a driver of a motor vehicle in operation, such as a motor vehicle, a driver of the motor vehicle in operation, who is a driver of the motor vehicle in front of the Enterprise Bank located in Pyeongtaek-dong, for approximately two weeks of treatment of the victim C (59 years of age); (b) committed assault to the victim, who is a driver of the motor vehicle in operation, such as a driver of the motor vehicle, who is a driver of the motor vehicle in operation, and was in front of the Gyeong-si Do Police Station located in Pyeongtaek-si in the Do of Pyeongtaek-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement made by the defendant in this Court;

1. A statement made by C in this Court;

1. Entry of the defendant's partial statement and entry of C in the interrogation protocol (C and comparison) of the defendant as to the defendant prepared by the public prosecutor;

1. Statement C in relation to C prepared by the police officer (the defendant and his/her confrontation)

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Recording a record of the statement of the victim in preparation of stenographic paper E; and

1. Entry into an investigation report prepared by the prosecution (to hear statements at the time of the victim's situation and report);

1. Statement of investigation report prepared by the police;

1. Each image of each photograph (Evidence No. 10 pages);

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel as to each of the respective injury diagnosis statements against doctor F, G, and H C

1. Although the gist of the assertion was that the Defendant, as a matter of the taxi operation route at the time of the instant case, brought about a little disturbance, such as leaving the Kim Dob, which was cited by the Defendant as a matter of the taxi operation route, he did not cause an injury to the victim by walking at several times.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, namely, ① the victim ranging from the investigative agency to this court, to the day before the police box was sent to the police box, and the victim gets a front of the police box.