logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.05.09 2014고단1032
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

Summary of Facts charged

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in transportation business as the owner of B vehicle. On October 25, 2004, around 15:40 on October 25, 2004, the Defendant violated the restrictions on the operation of vehicles by a road management authority by loading freight of at least 11.2 tons on the third axis and loading and operating more than 10 tons of limited storage weight in excess of 10 tons, while operating the said truck with respect to the Defendant’s business.

2. On December 9, 2004, the Defendant was a person who is engaged in transportation business as the owner of DF truck. On December 11, 2004, the Defendant violated the restrictions on the operation of vehicles of road management authorities by loading and operating DF truck with freight of 11.3 tons and 11.3 tons in 4 livestocks, and loading and operating limited weight of more than 10 tons by loading and operating DF truck with freight of 11.3 tons in 3 livestocks and 11.3 tons in 4 livestocks.

3. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in transportation business as the owner of a FF truck. On August 15, 2003, the Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of a road management authority by loading freight of 10.81 ton and 11.23 ton on the 2 axis, while operating the FF truck at a business office of a 26.9km starting point of the KF Expressway 12:05 on August 15, 2003, G, an employee of the Defendant, in relation to the Defendant’s business, while operating the FF truck, in violation of the restriction on the operation of a vehicle.

4. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in transportation business as the owner of H cargo truck, and the Defendant, around 15:50 on April 15, 2002, operated the Defendant’s business on the 45 line National Highway 45 in Chungcheongnam-do, Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and the Defendant’s employee, as to the Defendant’s business, failed to comply with the said measurement without justifiable grounds even though he was urged by an employee in charge of the personnel in charge of the hostile control to enter the station to measure the load of the said truck.

5. The defendant.

arrow