Text
1. Of the instant lawsuits, the part of the claim to nullify the removal from position made on October 6, 2015 is dismissed.
2. The plaintiff's remainder.
Reasons
1. Factual basis
A. The status of the parties, the disposition of removal from position against the plaintiff, and the dismissal of the defendant are corporations with the aim of improving the living conditions of the people and promoting the efficient utilization of the national land by having them acquire, develop, stockpile and supply land, develop and improve urban communities, build, supply and manage housing, and thereby contributing to the development of the national economy, and the Korea Land and Housing Corporation.
The Plaintiff came to the following from July 28, 2015.
The Minister of Government Policy Coordination was subject to a disposition of dismissal from office under Article 38(1) of the Rules on Personnel Management of the Defendant on October 6, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “instant dismissal from office”) due to an act deemed to be conducted in the Office for Government Policy Coordination and upon receipt of an audit conducted by the Office for Government Policy Coordination (hereinafter referred to as “the instant dismissal from office”), and on February 29, 2016, upon receipt of a notice of removal from office under a resolution of the Defendant General Personnel Committee and filing a request for reexamination, and on March 23, 2016
(hereinafter referred to as “instant dismissal”) b.
The Defendant Civil Service Commission’s act and the subsequent disciplinary cause for dismissal of the Plaintiff’s act are deemed to have violated the code of conduct for the Defendant’s employees and employees (hereinafter “Code of Conduct”), and accordingly, decided to dismiss the Plaintiff in accordance with attached Table 6 (Standards for Disciplinary Punishment, hereinafter “Attachment 6”) and attached Table 7 (Standards for Disciplinary Punishment, hereinafter “Attachment 6”) related to Article 76(1) of the Enforcement Rule of the Personnel Affairs Regulations (Standards for Disciplinary Punishment, hereinafter “Attachment 6”), and attached Table 7 (hereinafter “Attachment 7”).
① Acceptance and delivery of tables, etc. from B who is a job-related person: From January 20, 2015, the Plaintiff in violation of Article 18(1) of the Code of Conduct was in office as the head of Defendant C, and was in general in charge of the design, execution and management of landscaping works in the competent business district, and D, which is the vice president of B, is supplied with the Defendant and the above C, to the landscaping work under the jurisdiction of the said C on July 14, 2014.