1. The Intervenor’s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are borne by the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

purport.

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this case in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The grounds alleged by the Defendant in the first instance trial are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance trial, and all the evidence submitted in the first instance trial and the first instance trial are examined, the fact-finding and judgment of the first instance court that the labor relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendant in the Defendant in the first instance are terminated by the agreement termination are recognized as legitimate). Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim is justified, and the judgment of the first instance court is justified and the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed as it is so decided as per Disposition.