logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.04.23 2013가단220087
보험금
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s main claim is dismissed.

2. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) is KRW 4,000,000,000 against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. On April 27, 2005, the Defendant concluded an insurance contract with the Plaintiff and the insured as shown in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) with the Defendant, and paid the insurance premium to the Plaintiff.

B. According to the insurance contract of this case, where the defendant under the insurance contract of this case was performed directly for the purpose of treating a female specific disease under the terms and conditions of expenses for the surgery for women's specific disease under the insurance contract of this case (the term "operation under the insurance contract of this case" refers to the operation of cutting, piling, etc. to the living body by using the medical institution for the direct purpose of treating a female specific disease, and excluding the measures such as smoking, tent, etc., and the chronic blocking), it guarantees 4,00,000 won at the cost of the surgery for women's specific disease.

C. On March 4, 2013, the Defendant was diagnosed at the Future Women’s Hospital located at the lower end of 596-14, 2013, with a view to treating bluToluluene, sampling, and blusium surgery, to treat this on the same day.

Around April 15, 2013, the Defendant filed a claim against the Plaintiff for the payment of insurance proceeds on the ground that the Plaintiff had undergone an operation for the purpose of treating a female specific disease as above. However, the Plaintiff refused the payment of insurance proceeds on the ground that the Defendant’s treatment was not a breath alcohol, which is the cause for the payment of insurance proceeds under the instant insurance contract.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap 1, 2, 3 (including paper numbers), Eul 1 through 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the principal lawsuit and counterclaim

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1 of the parties’ assertion is the cause of the principal claim. The term “a surgery,” which is the cause of the payment of insurance money under the insurance contract of this case, means treating either skin or booms, or other organizations by means of cutting, cutting, etc. using medical devices. The Defendant’s brytolin, sampling, which was administered, is reciting balsculmat

arrow