A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

While the Defendant worked as 20 or more security guards of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment land C, he was delegated by the committee for the management of the above apartment house in the process of the 23th executive election of the representative council of occupants of the above apartment, and was in charge of distributing and receiving voting papers and managing ballot boxes based on the electoral register against the aforementioned apartment

1. On April 5, 2016, the Defendant forged the signature of the above D, etc. by inserting the name of each resident as if he/she actually received the voting paper and signed it in the column for the recipient of each voting paper for the above 20 apartment units, without authority, for the purpose of exercising the right at the beginning of the above apartment units 20 apartment units on April 5, 2016, each of the above 20 apartment units No. 13, 27, 47, 55, 71, 77, 93, and 95 among the above 20 apartment units’ 20 apartment units, and issuing it to the person in charge of the committee for the election management of the above apartment units as if he/she was aware of the fact that the resident had actually received the voting paper and signed it.

2. The Defendant interfered with the duties of the Defendant, at the same time, at the same place as in the foregoing paragraph 1, and with the method as in the foregoing paragraph 1, obstructed the election of executive officers of the said apartment occupant representative meeting by arbitrarily exercising his/her right to vote for the total number of 10 households of Nos. 13, 27, 47, 55, 57, 57, 57, 71, 77, 87, 87, 93, and 95 on behalf of the occupants of the said apartment building on behalf of the occupants, including D, in order to show that the occupants, such as D, were actually voting

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement by the police concerning L;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of written confirmation;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 239 of the Official Signature) regarding the facts constituting an offense, Article 239 (2) and Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of exercising the above investigation signature) and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interfering with business and the choice of imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code of Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes;