logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.10.24 2016나32221 (1)
부당이득금
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

In accordance with the preliminary claims added at the trial, the Defendants are subject to the said preliminary claims.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) 1) Investment Agreement between D and E

) The Seodaemun-gu Seoul Western District Housing Association (hereinafter referred to as the “F apartment”) is an apartment of the F apartment.

) The apartment of the Seoul Mapo-gu District Housing Association (hereinafter referred to as “G apartment”) and the Seoul Mapo-gu District Housing Association

(2) D) on August 10, 2007, as the executor, invested 100 million won from E between E and E, an attorney-at-law belonging to H, a law firm H, and agreed to pay 100 million won equivalent to the principal of the investment by October 10, 2007, which is two months later, and 6 months later to February 10, 2008, respectively.

D as a security for the above investment funds of E, E has issued to E a contract in which the balance of F apartment 33 square-type 2, G 33 square-type 2, and G apartment-type 33 square-type 2, and if the payment of the investment principal is completed within the above two months, G apartment is to be recovered from E, and F apartment is to be recovered from E if the payment of 100 million won is completed within the above six months, and if each corresponding amount is not paid within each such period, E can dispose of the above apartment-type 33 square-type 2, at will.

Afterward, E added to D the aforementioned arrangement (hereinafter referred to as “instant investment agreement”) with additional investment of KRW 100 million on August 14, 2007, ② August 27, 2007, ③ September 4, 2007, respectively.

(However, in the case of an investment agreement made on September 4, 2007, D received a total of 400 million won from E four times in accordance with the investment agreement in this case. At the end, E has paid D the total amount of KRW 890,000,000 for 33 square-type 2 households of apartment units G (45,000 x 26,000,000 won for 33 square-type 2 households of F apartment units (33 square-type 28,000,000 won x 264,000 won x 2000,000 won).

arrow