A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 3, 2019, at around 23:39, the Defendant reported at the back seat of the C cab parked in front of the building B in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and requested several times to leave the taxi at the taxi where he/she had the accurate home address from E, and did not comply with the request to leave the taxi at the taxi where he/she had the exact home address. He/she did not comply with the request. He/she shall see “I am. I am. I am. I will am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am at the seat next to the Defendant while I got off the taxi, while I got off the taxi and did not get off the taxi, I am at the face of E.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act: (a) there is a need to strictly punish a crime of obstruction of performance of official duties in order to establish a state’s legal order and eradicate the light of public authority; (b) circumstances favorable to the defendant who has been punished by a suspended sentence or a fine for violent crimes: The defendant has no record of punishment since 2007; and (c) there is no record of punishment for obstruction of performance of official duties, and there is no record of punishment as a crime of obstruction of official duties; and (d) the sentencing conditions specified in