The judgment below

The guilty part and the attached list 2, 7, 9 of the crime committed in the attached list 2017.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Prosecutor 1) The Prosecutor stated that the Defendant violated the Information and Communications Network Act (hereinafter “Act”) on August 11, 2016 and the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information (Defamation) (hereinafter “Defamation”) on August 16, 2016, which was alleged by the Prosecutor of the facts charged by mistake of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles (not guilty portion) and 12017 senior 714-2014. The Defendant’s comments on each of the following facts: (a) the Defendant prepared a letter of accusation with the intent that the victim would be bound by the crime of false accusation; and (b) the Defendant consistently stated that there was no fact that the victim made an erroneous accusation against the O; (c) the Defendant’s statement to the effect that the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Network Utilization and Information Protection (hereinafter “Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Network Utilization and Information Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc.”); (d) the Defendant’s statement to the effect that this part of the Defendant’s statement was false.

In light of the background leading up to the reversal of the N’s statement, since the N’s statement is less reliable, this part of the notice constitutes false facts. The content of this part of the notice Nos. 1 and 2 of the crime sight table No. 52017, 977 constitutes a statement of fact, and the victim’s letter of intent.