Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the above fine is not paid, one hundred thousand won shall be converted into one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who actually operates a general restaurant with the trade name of "C" in Gangseo-si B.

No one shall sell, lend, distribute (including cases of selling, lending, or distributing drugs, etc. harmful to juveniles through automatic machines, unmanned vending machines, or communication devices) or provide such drugs, etc. free of charge to juveniles.

A. On November 29, 2015, the Defendant sold alcoholic beverages equivalent to KRW 25,00,00, including KRW 6 Byung-ju, A-ju, and A-ju, and KRW 25,00,00, without verifying the age of juvenile D (16), E (16), and F (16) at the above Defendant’s operating establishment.

B. On December 20, 2015, the Defendant sold alcoholic beverages equivalent to KRW 24,00,00, including KRW 2 bottles and 16,000, without verifying the age of juvenile G (17, H (16, and I (16) at the above Defendant’s business establishment that operated the Defendant’s above Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

[Case A]

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made with respect to E, D, and F;

1. Each statement of D, E, and F;

1. A certificate of business report, a business registration certificate, and a receipt (as indicated in the judgment; b)

1. Each police statement made to G, I, and H;

1. Each statement of I, G and H;

1. Application of the business report certificate, business registration certificate, and receipt Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 59 subparagraph 6 of the relevant Act and Article 28 (1) of the Juvenile Protection Act that choose a punishment for an offense;

1. Article 37 (former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 (A) of the Criminal Act (an aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes as provided for in paragraph (1) above) of the Act on the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that there is a record of the same kind of crime for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, the fact that the second crime was committed after the control over the first crime of this case, and the fact that only a request for formal trial to the purport of recognizing the facts charged of this case is not present at the court, a decision is made.