beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Around August 3, 2011, the Defendant purchased an EF&C C&C Corporation’s agent located in Suwon-si, and registered the purchase price under its own name in 2006-type B B B 13.2ton, and entered into an agreement with the victim EF Savings Bank on the purchase price of Obb 72,00,000,000 won, and promised to pay an installment of 2,11,240 won on the 10th of each month, and set up a mortgage on the said construction machinery in the name of the victim, which is the maximum debt amount of 72,00,000,000 won.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, even though he did not pay the installment up until January 9, 2012, had been aware that the victim urged the Defendant to pay the installment payments and transfer construction machinery several times, and that he wanted to commence the procedure of voluntary auction based on the right to collateral security established on the said construction machinery, but he could not know the location of the case by transferring the above excavation machine as payment for the construction cost unpaid to C at the construction site of the construction site of the construction site of the irregular park at the time of the construction site of the construction site.
In this respect, the defendant concealed the object which is the object of the mortgage, which is the victim's right, and obstructed the exercise of the right.
Summary of Evidence
1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to accusation, agreement on loan of construction machinery, construction machinery register, and credit transaction statement;
1. Taking into account the fact that the scope of damage on the grounds of sentencing under Article 323 of the Criminal Act and Article 323 (Selection of Imprisonment) of the Act on the Punishment of Criminal Crimes is considerable and the recovery of damage is not properly made, that the defendant is not bona fide in the trial, that the defendant has a history of fine for one time, and that there is only