logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.04.05 2015가단37518
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 46,266,00 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from October 6, 2015 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff supplied the wire network over five times upon receiving a request from the Defendant for the order of the wire network from the Defendant. However, upon the Defendant’s request, the Plaintiff as C was a stock company. Since the price was KRW 46,266,00, including value-added tax, the Defendant is obligated to pay it to the Plaintiff.

B. Trading with the Defendant is not C Co., Ltd.

The defendant and C are separate corporations, and C are merely leasing and using a building from the defendant, and the plaintiff's claim is without merit.

2. Determination

A. The fact-finding corporation C is a company whose main business is the production and supply of scrap, and the defendant is a company engaged in the business related to the press of motor vehicles.

All the defendant and C companies are located in the place of business of the racing-si D.

At this point, C was engaged in the business, but the defendant did not run the business, and the signboard is the name of the defendant.

E stated in the police investigation that he is actually operating the corporation C and the defendant.

F and G paid health insurance premiums, etc. to the employees of C, and F are only life cards that are the defendant's directors, and they do not have the name cards of C.

F is engaged in the business related to the strike, and the defendant's business affairs related to the motor vehicle press, which is the defendant's business, was processed, and the payment or the issuance of tax invoice was the defendant.

F and G found the plaintiff as the first policeman in December 2014 and requested their supply of wire-nets as the defendant's employees.

F The Defendant’s director and G ordered the Plaintiff to write the name of the Defendant’s vice-director.

On January 10, 2015, the Plaintiff’s intra-company director H sought the Defendant, and E stated the name of the Defendant’s representative director.

On January 19, 2015, the Plaintiff KRW 4.5 million, and KRW 300,450,000,000 on January 26, 2015.

arrow