logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.11.15 2019가단137614
양수금
Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff KRW 102,724,860 and the remainder thereof:

A. From June 18, 2019, for KRW 67,570,942

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

(However, the “creditor” is the Plaintiff, and the “debtor” is the Defendant respectively). 2. The written reply that is the basis of recognition (Article 208(3)2 and the main text of Article 150(3)3 and the main text of Article 150(1) of the Civil Procedure Act) must include not only the reply to the purport of the claim but also the recognition of each fact recorded in the complaint.

(Article 65(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure. However, even though the Defendants submitted a written objection against the payment order on July 15, 2019, they merely asserted the purport that they should raise an objection on the payment order, there is no answer as to the facts alleged by the Plaintiff as the cause of claim, and even without submitting any written recommendation for the amendment regarding the submission of the substantive response by this court, the above written objection against the payment order was deemed to have been a statement because the said written objection was not present on the date of pleading, and thus, the Defendants deemed to have led to the confession of the Plaintiff’s assertion

arrow