A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 24, 2018, the Defendant sent a Kakao Stockholm message (E) to the victim C (hereinafter “E”) who had a tobacco at a closed place on April 24, 2018, stating that “I have a bomer’s bome’s bome’s bome’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bomer’s bom.” from that time until April 28, 2013.

The victim threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of the Kakao Stockholm Act to the content of conversation;

1. Relevant Article 283 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. Application of the sentencing criteria;

(a) Each crime of intimidation [the scope of a recommended punishment] is the basic area (two months to one year) of the crime of intimidation (no person who is subject to special sentencing).

(b) The scope of final sentence due to the aggravation of multiple offenses: Imprisonment with prison labor for two months from one year to ten months;

2. The nature of the instant crime is not very good for the victim, who had a relation with the determination of the sentence of punishment, who threatened the victim with repeated dissemination of balone photographs, etc.

The victim seems to have suffered a considerable mental suffering, and the victim was not able to receive a prudent from the victim.

The Defendant, prior to the instant crime, has been subject to punishment by inflicting an injury on a female-friendly Gu prior to the instant crime.

On the other hand, there is no other history of punishment, and it seems that all of the crimes of this case are recognized and reflected.

In the above circumstances.