A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 23, 2015, at around 09:30, the Defendant: (a) opened a gate with no corrective device and intrudes upon the victim’s residence by entering the gate in front of the house of the victim D, which was located in C at the time of leisure.

From January 27, 2015 to January 16:00, the Defendant infringed upon another person’s residence four times, such as the list of crimes in attached Form 16:00.

2. On January 23, 2015, at around 10:00, the Defendant: (a) opened a gate with no corrective device and intrudes into the inner part of the Victim F in F, which was in front of the house; (b) and (c) cut off with a string 200,000 won or less at the market price of the victim’s ownership; and (d) cut off with a string with a string of 400,000 won or more at the market price of the victim’s ownership.

In addition, from around that time to January 24, 2015, the Defendant abused another’s residence, such as the list of offenses, and stolen the property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of G, F, H, I, J, K, and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to low-flosh photographs, damaged photographs, field inspection photographs;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and selective theft of punishment concerning facts constituting an offense: Intrusion upon residence under Article 329 of the Criminal Act: Selection of imprisonment under Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes [the scope of recommending punishment] No person who does not have a basic area (one to two years and six months) (one year) (one year and six months) of types of larceny in general property] [decision of sentence] 1 year, although there was an agreement with some victims, although the total amount of damage was not substantial and there was no significant amount of damage (whether agreement was reached or not is considered as the reason for sentencing as the amount of damage was not significant). The defendant's attitude of committing the crime was stolen by intrusion upon another person's residence in such a way as to be close to the very damp wall, and the risk of recidivism is considered as above.