A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 29, 2014, at around 20:10, the Defendant discovered the victim with the victim C and Si expenses attached to the (oil) Geum River alcohol office located in Ansan-si, 1352, Ansan-si, 1352, and assaulted the victim by booming the brea of the victim by hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Part of C’s legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the hearing of witnesses DNA telephone statements;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. On August 29, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 20:10, and around 20:10 on August 29, 2014, the charge was that the Defendant: (b) discovered the victim with the victim C and Si expenses attached to the said company, and (c) caused the injury to the victim, her hand, such as the victim’s dump spathing, spathing, spawd, spawd, and tension that require approximately 14 days of medical treatment.

2. Determination

A. As evidence consistent with the above facts charged, C’s legal statement, the police interrogation protocol of C with respect to the suspect, the written statement of C (hereinafter “victim’s statement evidence”), the suspect’s injury part photograph, and the injury diagnosis statement are included.

B. Determination on evidence 1) The victim’s statement evidence as to the victim’s statement evidence is difficult to believe it as it is for the following reasons. D, a witness, consistently at the investigative agency, stated that “the Defendant did not look at the victim’s flaps, and did not do so.” This is different from the content of the victim’s statement evidence, which is “the Defendant threatened the Defendant with snow as flabing the blaps and blaps with the blaps.”

B) The Defendant consistently stated that he did not have the victim’s head fat, with the victim’s head fat, even though he did not keep the victim’s head fat. 2) The victim prepared by the doctor E to determine the death diagnosis document.