logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.06.02 2017노779
절도미수등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The fact that the defendant misunderstanding the fact was entering the victim's house on January 11, 2017 is recognized. However, since the elderly who was a person in infinite's name enters the victim's house because he/she had the intention to assist himself/herself, there is no intention to larceny and intrusion, and even though he/she did not commence the commission of larceny, the court below found the defendant guilty of all the facts charged under different premise, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (one year of imprisonment, one year of confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following facts are acknowledged according to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court on the assertion of mistake of facts.

(1) On January 11, 2017, a victim was exposed to the password of the head of a Tong from a person who misrepresents his/her employee to the Financial Supervisory Service.

If the cash is deducted and stored in the cooling house, the employee in charge shall visit and resolve it.

In addition, documents should be removed from the D's office for the collection of money in the bank.

Receiving a telephone from the fact that the money sought was put in the cooling house and was called as the Dong office.

② The victim withdrawn 20 million won in cash from his bank account and included the above 20 million won in the cooling house of the victim in the J in Yangyang-si, Namyang-si.

The victim found that the defendant, who was a foreigner, was entering the alley of the witness's house, in accordance with the currency with the victim's name and the victim's name, was living in D Dong office, and the victim saw it as driving away from the defendant. ③ The defendant obtained a password, entered the victim's house, and was living in front of the victim's house at the time when the victim was discovered.

Although the defendant was suffering from the defendant, the victim who escaped from the defendant was "the Do Do Do Do Do Do", the victim was "the Do Do Do Do Do Do " and sound.

arrow