(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.01.17 2017구합72065

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.01.17 2017구합72065

순직유족보상금 부지급 결정 취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 1, 1984, the Plaintiff’s husband B (hereinafter “the deceased”) was appointed as a local administrative secretary on September 1, 1984, and served in the Busan Regional Office on April 15, 1986, and was appointed as a tax office reporter on the same day after he was dismissed from office on April 15, 1986, and was promoted in sequence to the Grade VI customs officer on January 17, 2001, and on June 1, 201, the Korea Customs Service’s revenue and customs clearance officer on February 24, 2014.

B. On April 24, 2016, the Deceased committed suicide with the first floor floor level from the sixth floor of the building of the E Customs Headquarters around 19:48.

C. The Plaintiff filed a claim for the payment of compensation for survivors of public officials who died on duty with respect to the deceased’s death. However, according to the result of handling a change of the deceased’s death case, the Defendant stated the pressure at the time of failure to adapt to the fear of the data processing system, and how his position and form at the time of retirement or retirement of the public official, etc., in light of the degree of pressure at the time of his/her change of the data processing system, and how his/her own position and form, etc., are indicated. The written statement including the bereaved family members, etc., was prescribed and used as a body guidance system as well as stated. In light of the fact that the deceased’s death appears to be sufficiently overcoming from the standpoint of ordinary average or workers, and that the statement about psychological burden following the change of the computer network is made even before the death day, it is difficult to see that the deceased’s normal perception or ability to choose action was significantly deteriorated at the time of death, and thus, the deceased’s compensation for death appears to fall under the death of public official duty.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”) D.

The plaintiff.

유사 판례

-서울행정법원 2018.11.16 2017구합86484

-서울행정법원 2019.03.22 2017구합58519

-서울행정법원 2019.02.01 2017구합72966

-서울행정법원 2019.03.22 2018구합65439

-서울행정법원 2018.04.26 2017구합58526