All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal (eight months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution) is deemed to be too unhued and unfair.

2. The Defendants have been engaged in the business of arranging sexual traffic for a considerable period of time, and the Defendants’ act of arranging sexual traffic has considerable social harm, such as the commercialization of sex and the harm to the sound sexual culture and good morals, and thus requires strict punishment. However, there are favorable circumstances, such as the Defendants’ confessions and reflects the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime, and there is no record of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime. In full view of the circumstances leading to the instant crime, the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the age of the Defendants, sexual behavior, environment, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too uneasible, and thus, it is not recognized that the aforementioned assertion by the prosecutor is unfair.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal against the defendants is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.