logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.10.23 2014고단2402
약사법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and February of one year, and a fine of KRW 10,00,000.

The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as a health radar, purchased a single-clocking agents from D, E, F, etc., which facilitates the synthesis, etc. of the surrounding land, and thought them to sell them.

1. Any person who intends to import medicines, etc. in violation of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act due to import of drugs shall obtain permission or report from the Minister of Food and Drug Safety for each item

Nevertheless, around March 29, 2014, the Defendant imported drugs with 100 square meters of 100 square meters, respectively, via the Kimhae International Airport on April 4, 2014, on the ground that: (a) around 2014, the Defendant imported drugs with 70 square meters of 100 square meters of 10,000 p.m., “S. E., P., P., P.P. P., P., P.D., P., P., P.D.,” manufactured at P.S. L., a single-c.i.e., single-c., f., c., s.i., s.e., c., s., s.i., c., s.s.

2. No person who violates the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act due to the sale and acquisition of medicines for the purpose of sale may sell or acquire medicines for the purpose of sale, other than a pharmacy founder;

D and D, despite the fact that they are not pharmacy founders, the Defendant recruited drug buyers, such as a single-bagic spheroid system, and notified D of the contact address, etc. of the purchaser, and D conspired to dispatch the above drug to the purchaser at the intervals of time.

On July 24, 2013, the Defendant, in collusion with D, sold medicines equivalent to KRW 5,140,00,000 in total on 11 occasions, as shown in the separate sheet of crime (1) from September 12, 2013 to September 24, 2013, to a person whose name is unknown at the home of the Defendant’s office located in M apartment 302 Dong 1405, Busan Seo-gu, Busan, and to a person whose name is unknown.

B. Although E and E are not a pharmacy owner, the Defendant is a co-principal and a co-principal.

arrow