Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Part of the facts charged shall be revised and supplemented without going through amendments to indictment to the extent that it seems that there is no concern about substantial disadvantage to the defendant's defense right.

On January 4, 2019, at around 23:25, the Defendant 112 reported that the Defendant was frighting in front of the building in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, a police officer affiliated with the Seoul Seocho Police Station C commander of the Seoul Western Police Station who was called out after having received a report of 112 that the Defendant was frightd away by hand so that the police officers assigned to the Seoul Western Police Station C commander of the Seoul Western Police Station would not shut down the front door of the patrol police officer’s order to move to move to a separate military report. The Defendant spicked the police officer D(the age of 30) who belongs to the Seoul Seocho Police Station C commander of the Seoul Western Police Station to stop this order, and continued to d'

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning patrol and handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and D;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Where an act of violence or intimidation is committed against multiple public officials who perform the same duties as an ordinary concurrent act, multiple crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties are established according to the number of public officials who perform official duties, and where the above act of violence or intimidation was committed in the same opportunity at the same place, and it is assessed as one act under the social concept, multiple crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties are crimes of conceptual concurrence.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2009Do3505 Decided June 25, 2009). Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment (the appointment of a fine of KRW 2 million has no record of criminal punishment, in addition to the punishment of a fine of KRW 2 million due to an assault committed nine years prior to the occurrence of a single punishment (the confession of a single criminal act, reflects that a single criminal act is committed, that a criminal act is committed against an injured police officer, and that the injured police officer appears to have received such a punishment; that the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties is relatively minor; and that there

1. Detention at a workhouse;