Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around October 9, 2016, the Defendant interfered with his/her duties, who took a victim D (son, 56 years old) in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and continued to ask the injured party about his/her seat on the taxi in Jung-gu, Seoul. The Defendant repeated the word “house, Korean house, and beneficiary”.

The defendant was requested from the injured person to return home from other taxi, but the defendant did not have a seat after opening the taxi and take the seat in hand, and did not get off the taxi, and was able to avoid disturbance for about 30 minutes, such as making alcohol to the injured person and splowing.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's taxi operation by force.

2. On October 9, 2016, at around 02:25, the Defendant: (a) sent the 112-reported taxi to another place after receiving a report on the said “1” by Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul to the F District Department G belonging to the F District of the Seoul Southern Police Station; (b) the police officer sent the damaged taxi to the other place for D’s business; and (c) whether the police officer sent the taxi to the other place.

“A domestic corporation is a victim, why you send a taxi and grow up.”

Before doing public bath, “,” and repeated the act of opening and closing approximately 20 minutes of patrol patrols on the rear side, and during that process, both hand h’s chest was pushed down twice.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the 112 reporting processing, which is a legitimate official duty of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and H;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties), and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Fines of 50,000 to 250 million won;

2. The defendant's age, sex, as it is the initial crime for the decision of sentence, the fact that it appears to be a contingent crime, and reflects it.