1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and such reasoning is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article

(1) The court below's findings and determination are just in light of the evidence duly adopted and examined at the court of first instance, and there is no error as alleged in the ground of appeal by the plaintiff). 2. The part adding the judgment is that D is the defendant's representative director and the actual owner of the bill, and since C is the representative of D, the defendant et al. issued or endorsed the bill of this case with a view to guaranteeing a civil obligation which is the cause of issuance and endorsement of the bill of this case. Thus, the defendant et al. is jointly and severally liable for payment of 10,000,000 won based on the bill of this case and delayed payment damages therefor to the plaintiff. Thus, the defendant et al. bears the liability under the Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes Act for the obligee of the bill of this case. However, if it is deemed that the representative director of the bill of this case's issuance or endorsement will guarantee an obligation under the civil law, which is the cause of the bill of this case's issuance and endorsement, 200,5209.