logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.11.21 2019고단5315
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A In October, Defendant B is punished by a fine of KRW 3 million, Defendant C is punished by a fine of KRW 3 million, Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person operating a "F Gameland" game in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and Defendant B and Defendant C are employees of each of the above game places, and Defendant D is an exchange prize for cash exchange of game points to customers in the above game place.

1. No one shall engage in a business of exchanging or arranging the exchange or repurchase of tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products by the Defendants;

Nevertheless, around April 2019, Defendant A and Defendant B divided an IC card into customers in the above game room, and if customers obtain points by inserting an IC card in a “G” game machine, and request exchange, Defendant A and Defendant B conspired to exchange the IC card in cash.

Defendant

A and Defendant B, around April 2019, in the above game site, requested the Defendant B, an employee of the game, to exchange the 's door-to-door' with cancer relief, Defendant B contact with the ir own name-free money exchange. After the locking, Defendant B provided cancer relief to the customer, and had the customer find it to a designated place, Defendant B carried out the game room business by collecting the IC card by paying the 10% of the fee after confirming the points stored in the IC card of the customer by using smartphones and cards.

After that, on June 2019, Defendant C was an employee of Defendant C, and Defendant D participated in the business of the above game site as a money exchange prize, and arranged money exchange or money exchange to many unspecified customers by the same method from around that time to July 16, 2019.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to arrange the exchange or exchange of tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

2. Defendants A, B, and C’s game products related to joint criminal conduct.

arrow