beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2016 Highest 7419"
1. On August 2015, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim B: “The Defendant owns 4-5 houses with 4-5 houses in the Sinsan, and immediately sold the houses in the Sinsan, and the sales price of KRW 2.5 billion around September 21, 2015 is to be paid to the victim B, with a high interest, if it is lent to the extent that the money is urgently needed.
“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”
However, in fact, the defendant did not own a house owned by the defendant, and even if he did not borrow money from the damaged party due to no particular property or income at the time, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.
Nevertheless, on August 11, 2015, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred KRW 5,000,000 to the victim through a deposit account in the name of the defendant Saemaul Treasury in the name of the defendant on August 11, 2015.
From September 12, 2015, the Defendant received a total of KRW 125,00,000 from that time until September 12, 2015 as stated in the list of crimes in the annexed sheet of crimes.
2. Crimes against victims C;
A. On February 24, 2016, the Defendant phoneed the victim C at a non-permanent area (hereinafter referred to as Suwon-si) and created a volume of 2,000 square meters in the south of the water complex.
The site is also purchased, 70-80% was completed in the state of authorization and permission, and 50,000 won is to be invested if the land is to be sold, and 300 square meters is to be invested.
Even if it is not necessary, the sale will be 150 million won, and may be punished for more than 100 million won if it is waiting for 6 months.
“The purpose was to make a false statement.”
However, the defendant did not engage in the development project of the electric power complex in South Korea, and even if he did not have any particular property or income at the time and received money from the damaged party, he did not have any intention or ability to repay it.
Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above.