The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of any statement in the supplemental appellate brief that was filed after the time limit for submission).

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below is just in finding the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, misapprehending the legal principles on occupational negligence and causation

In addition, the issue of whether or not to resume closed pleadings is the matter belonging to the court's discretion.

Therefore, after the closing of argument, the court below sentenced the defendant to the resumption of oral argument without denying the application for resumption of oral argument and without resumption of oral argument.

there is an error in law.

subsection (3) of this section.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2005Do6503 Decided October 28, 2005, etc.). Examining the record in light of the records, the lower court’s litigation procedures are not unlawful as otherwise alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.