logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.04.26 2016고단501
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal experience] On July 24, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for one year to imprisonment with labor for a violation of road traffic law (dacting driving) in the support for the development of the Suwon method. The above judgment became final and conclusive on August 1, 2014.

In this case, not Article 151-2(1) of the Road Traffic Act, but Article 151-2(2) of the same Act was prosecuted for a crime of Article 151-2(2) of the same Act, the remainder of the fine due to drinking driving shall not be recorded

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle with sod vehicle from D.

On September 10, 2015, the Defendant driven the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.207% from the blood alcohol level around 07:34 on September 10, 2015, and driven the three-lane road of the front E-do in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, the Defendant driven the said vehicle along the two-lanes in the direction of the upper three-lane in the direction of the upper three-lane.

Since there are few signals near the intersection, a person engaged in driving duty has a duty of care to see the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and led by negligence to the front part of the Defendant’s driving of the G Mystren car at the victim F(50) driving, which was parked in the same lane in front of the same lane.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. On September 10, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) driven the said D AW-to-pured vehicle at the section of approximately 300 meters away from the road of the 434-ro, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, the alcohol concentration of which is 0.207%, while under the influence of alcohol during blood at around 07:34, Sept. 1015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the detection of a primary driver and a report on the circumstances of the primary driver;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of written inquiries about criminal history and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow