logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2014.11.28 2014노854
자동차손해배상보장법위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

After filing an appeal against the lower judgment on August 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) received a written notification of the receipt of the trial record from this court on September 19, 2014; and (b) did not submit the statement of grounds for appeal within 20 days from the date the period for submitting the written notification of the receipt of the trial record; (c) the petition of appeal does not contain any indication of the grounds for appeal; and (d) no other reason for ex officio investigation exists even after examining the records; and (e) the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Articles 361-4(1) and

However, in the application of the law of the lower judgment, the phrase “1. In the case of detention in the workhouse” under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is apparent that the phrase “Article 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act” is a clerical error under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act, and thus, it is apparent that it is a clerical error under Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure. Thus, the ex officio correction

November 28, 2014

arrow