logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.22 2014고단9686
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 13:00 on March 27, 2014, the Defendant visited the victim E at the home where the victim E resides in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D apartment 121 Dong 601 Dong, and visited the victim, using the gaps in surveillance of the said victim, the Defendant used the gaps in which the victim’s market price was 2,00,000,000 won in the victim’s room, which was 2,50,000,000,000 won in the victim’s room, and stolen it by putting in his/her own bank and her bank.

In addition, from around that time to November 9, 2014, the Defendant stolen the property owned by the victim E, F, and G in total amounting to KRW 68,200,000,00 for eight times, as stated in the separate crime list by the aforesaid method.

2. Intrusion upon residence;

A. On October 23, 2014, around 18:00 on October 23, 2014, the Defendant intruded into the said residence by using the password of the victim G and E, which was known in advance to the family of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H apartment 105 Dong 2804.

B. On November 9, 2014, around 13:04, the Defendant intruded into the said residence by using the victim’s house door password, which was known in advance, around November 13, 2014 to the victim F, Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D apartment 121 Dong 601.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of G;

1. Investigation report (attaching CCTV images, etc. submitted by a victim);

1. Investigation reports (verification of a list of damaged articles, etc. submitted by victims);

1. Investigation report (to be submitted by a victim or accompanied by a list of Additional damaged items);

1. A list of damaged articles;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Photographs of damaged articles;

1. A list of damaged articles;

1. Application of investigation reports (related to the list of damaged goods and the details of damaged goods identified in the list of crimes);

1. Relevant Articles 329 and 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the scope of recommending punishment) is to be considered as a special mitigation in April or February from 4 to September 2.

arrow