logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.02.12 2015고정67
하천법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 2014, the Defendant occupied and used a river site by re-establishing 1.2 square meters of height in the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si B and C river site, and 20 square meters of length of the Act on the Management of Land, etc.

2. Around July 10, 2014, the Defendant violated a river management agency’s order not to restore the site to its original state, even though the Defendant received the order to voluntarily restore the site to its original state from the Cheongju-si, the competent administrative agency, from July 13, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of some police officers against the defendant;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Investigation report (Investigation of the date of receiving the order of reinstatement), location map, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a photographic site;

1. Article 1 of the former River Act (amended by Act No. 1294, Jan. 6, 2015; hereinafter “former River Act”) Subparag. 5, Article 33(1)1 of the former River Act (amended by Act No. 1294, Jan. 6, 2015; hereinafter “former River Act”); Article 95 Subparag. 10, and Article 69(1)1 of the former River Act (amended by Act No. 12994, Jan. 6,

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow