logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.21 2015가단5133221
물품대금
Text

1. The defendant delivered 5,00 ScarF 5,00 as stated in the separate sheet from the plaintiff at the same time 8,000.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a company that manufactures and sells scarf upon receiving an order. The Defendant is a company that manufactures and sells golf bars, liquid books, etc. in Korea with its brand located in England, and D (hereinafter “non-party company”) is a company that manages the license of the Defendant’s brand.

B. On November 9, 2014, E, who was employed as the Defendant’s director, visited the Plaintiff Company and consulted about the request for the production of Scarf, who is a director.

E on November 19, 2014, requested F to send the Defendant’s Lats brand C-related data to the Plaintiff by e-mail and send a written estimate for the production of Scarf.

On November 25, 2014, F sent to the Plaintiff a written estimate for scarf production by e-mail.

C. On December 8, 2014, E and F: (a) visited the G director of the non-party company and requested a review to scarf to scarf in C brand; and (b) issued Scarf samples produced by the Plaintiff.

At the time, E requested Nonparty Company to send a Pampling to the Plaintiff, as it is necessary for the street and a consortium, and H employees of Nonparty Company sent CLuxembourg, C Introductions, Design Approval sets, etc. to the Plaintiff by e-mail.

E decided on December 17, 2014 to request the production of scarfs in total of 5,000 won per 15,000 scarfs with the original group, color, pattern, pattern, unit price, quantity, etc. of scarf to be requested by visiting F, and having consulted on the original group, color, pattern, unit price, and quantity of scarfs to be requested by production.

(Attachment List of Goods; hereinafter the same shall apply; hereinafter the same shall apply) E received 13 scarp samples completed from F until December 30, 2014, and the remainder was delivered by January 1.

E. From December 22, 2014 to January 24, 2015, the Plaintiff is a salt processing company, Inc., Ltd., a salt processing company, to the original part.

arrow