logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.11.28 2017누68174
손실보상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the court of first instance is not different from the argument in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance, which accepted part of the plaintiff's claim, is recognized as legitimate even if the submitted evidence

Therefore, the reasoning for the statement in this case is that the court's "this court" in the first instance court on the 3th page 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance is "the first instance court", and the 6th page 5's "this judgment" is respectively dismissed as "the judgment of the court of first instance", and the 7th class 8's "the 7th class 8' of each share 1's "the 7th class 8'

Inasmuch as the reasoning of the first instance judgment is the same as that of the first instance judgment, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow