The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, two years of probation, community service order, 160 hours of community service order, 40 hours of order to attend a compliance driving lecture) of the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant reflects the mistake while making a confession of the crime of this case, and the fact that the cargo vehicle driven by the defendant is covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, etc. are considered favorable to the defendant.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant while under the influence of 0.08% alcohol level, while driving a cargo vehicle in violation of the signal while driving the vehicle and causing the victim to suffer from the thirth of the 6th century. In light of the content of the crime, the degree of injury, etc., the nature of the crime is grave, the defendant does not take any specific measures to recover the damage of the victim, the defendant has the history of criminal punishment for the crime of drunk driving, and all other sentencing conditions specified in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.