Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) went on a taxi vehicle operated by the victim C in front of the Seocheon Station located in Seocheon-si on May 27, 2017; (b) was requested to pay the fare of KRW 45,000 from the damaged person, after arriving in front of the exit 4th of the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Sucheon-si, which was located in 9444, as in the Sucheon-si, Sucheon-si, the Defendant: (c) was: (d) the Defendant: “A

The charges are paid, i.e., whether or not to pay the fee

“Along with the payment of the rent for the taxi, the taxi operator refused to pay the fee for the taxi, until 05:00 on the same day, and obstructed the victim’s taxi operation by force by avoiding disturbance, such as launching the driver’s seat.

2. The Defendant interferes with the performance of official duties at the above date, time, place, and place.

“Absent” to E, on the ground that a police officer belonging to the Suwon Police Station D District of the Suwon Police Station, in receipt of a report 112, proposed him/her to leave the site of E, and assaulted E, such as putting him/her a bath to “saling,” and putting him/her on a drinking face.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. application of C and F’s investigation report and CD-related laws and subordinate statutes (for example, black stuff images in which a crime interfering with the performance of official duties is recorded);

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 316(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not be provided for in the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, taking into account the following factors: (a) contingent crimes; (b) recognition of errors and objections; and (c) absence of criminal history in the Republic of Korea; and (d) other factors constituting the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, the sentence shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the factors constituting