Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for up to eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 3468" - Defendant A

1. A violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) is between D, E, and Victim F and the Defendant had been aware of prior to towing, and G was between D and related persons.

On September 2014, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around that time, the Defendant sent letters, such as the “Damna Co., Ltd.”, to G, such around that time; (b) D, with the floor of hand, take the victim’s face, shoulder, etc. at a time; and (c) d, with a small-scale disease in the vicinity of the place, laid down on the ground floor by gathering it in his hand, and throw away from the ground floor.

”라고 소리치며 위험한 물건인 깨진 소주병을 피해자에게 들이댔다.

88,00

G sets up this, the victim's arms and legs continue to be taken twice by her hand, and the victim's arms and legs are taken on several occasions by drinking, E makes the victim's arms and legs several times by drinking, and the defendant made the part of the victim's arms by drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim jointly with D, G, and E.

2. On September 24, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) around 104 Hacheon-si Hacheon-si H apartment buildings, and on the grounds that the victim was able to examine the Defendant D and E, and that he was infence with the Defendant. D met the victim’s back water, shoulder, etc. with the hand floor, and E met the victim’s face, shoulder, etc. by drinking, and the Defendant was able to take the victim’s shoulder, etc. by drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim jointly with D and E.

3. Special larceny.

A. On December 17, 2014, the Defendant entered Ma, G, and Sincheon-si Library located in 101-29 Sincheon-ro, Sincheon-ro, 19:00 on December 17, 2014, and the Defendant and G reported the network to the Defendant and G, and D used the gap in which the victim I did not know the market price, including one resident registration certificate, debit card, etc., owned by the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant D.