logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.03.12 2014고정1684
폭행등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 10,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, “2014 high-level 1684,” even though the Victim B received the agreement for traffic accident with the Defendant’s aid, the Defendant had been unable to give good appraisal to the victim as a day when the Defendant used the full amount without any personnel room.

On August 22, 2013, the Defendant, at around 21:30, 2013, performed drinking together with drinking 41-3, such as D, etc. at a flood park located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, 21:30, and used the victim to spawn and spad the victim’s spath, spacing the spath, and spad the victim’s spats over the floor.

2. "2014 high-level 1685".

A. On September 28, 2013, from around 00:00 to 02:00, the Defendant, who interfered with the business, franchising the victim’s “F” in the operation of the victim E in Sungnam-si, and franchising the money given to the victim. The Defendant franchising the victim’s main business by force over about two hours, such as: (a) bitching the bitch of a bitch of a bitch bitch; (b) reporting the bitch of a bitch of a bitch; (c) reporting the bitch of a bitch of a bitch of a bitch; and (d) raising the speech to the customers drinking on other tables; and (c) interfering with the victim’s main business by force.

B. The Defendant, in the above place from 02:00 to 03:30 on the same day, has to close the door of the Defendant, let the said victim get out of the door, and let out the door, and even though the said victim demanded several times to reduce inn, he/she was seated over about one hour and 30 minutes, and left the door by smoking and staying there for about one hour and thirty minutes.

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

Summary of Evidence

"2014 High Court 1684"

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

2. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

3. Statement to C by the police;

4. Domination of damage "2014, 1685".

1. Some police interrogation protocol of A;

2. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts.

arrow