A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence 1 and 3 shall be confiscated, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, under the direction of a person who was unable to receive the name of the victim of the telephone financial fraud (hereinafter referred to as “Singing”), under the condition that he received 2% of the amount delivered per crime (excluding expenses), received the payment of cash from the victim of Bosing, the Defendant decided to take charge of cash collection to deposit without using a specific account directed by the person who was unable to receive the said statement.

On June 1, 2020, at around 11:38, 2020, the Defendant, by making a phone call to the victim B, recommended a low interest rate substitute loan, and then called “D card loan to the victim, which violated the Financial Law by again making a phone call to the victim, and then making a false statement that “The Plaintiff violated the Credit Team E” (hereinafter “D card loan”). The Defendant applied for a low interest rate loan and applied for a loan. All transactions will be suspended if the cash is to be repaid at the party, and all transactions will be suspended. The staff will be assigned to the legal team.”

However, in fact, the employee was not C or D's employee, and only he thought that he was obtained money from the victim without any intention or ability to repay the existing loans of the victim and acquired money from the victim.

From June 2, 2020 to June 11:50 to June 2, 2020, an employee under the name of the Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy had the victim believed to be true prepare cash, and the Defendant attempted to receive or receive cash of KRW 4,4150,000 through three times in total, including the following: (a) around 11:30 on June 2, 2020: (b) around 11:10,000 from the victim’s home located in Gwangju Mine-gu as an employee of the D legal team; (c) upon receipt of cash payment certificates from the victim; and (d) around 1:1:50 on June 11, 2020, the Defendant attempted to receive or receive cash.

Accordingly, the defendant did not receive or attempted to receive property by deceiving the victim in collusion with his nameless Bosing assistance staff.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;