All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 피고인 ⑴ 사실 오인 유죄 부분에 대하여, 피고인은 원심 판시와 같이 G의 낭 심을 힘껏 움켜쥔 사실이 없음에도, 신빙성 없는 G의 진술만을 근거로 이 부분 공소사실을 유죄로 인정한 원심판결에는 사실을 오인하여 판결에 영향을 미친 잘못이 있다.

The sentence sentenced by the court below, which was unfair in sentencing, (500,000 won) is too unreasonable.

B. As to the non-guilty portion of the facts charged by the prosecutor (i.e., the victim and witness, taking full account of the statements and objective circumstances of the victim and witness, the Defendant could fully recognize the fact that he had exercised force, such as cutting his handphone at the time of cutting off his cell phone. However, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine or by misapprehending the legal doctrine, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion

The sentence sentenced by the court below is too unfortunate and unfair.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

가. 피고인의 사실 오인 주장에 대하여 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들을 종합하여 보면, 피고인이 원심 판시 범죄사실 기재와 같이 피해자와 말다툼을 하다가 피해자에게 욕설을 하며 다가가 손으로 피해 자의 낭 심을 1회 움켜쥔 사실을 넉넉히 인정할 수 있으므로, 피고인의 사실 오인 주장은 받아들이지 아니한다.

B. As to the prosecutor’s assertion of mistake of facts, (i) the summary of the facts charged and the summary of this part of the facts charged by the lower court’s judgment are as follows: on the front day of “F” located in Songpa-gu Seoul on July 15, 2014, in the direction of “F” in Songpa-gu, Seoul around July 15, 2014; (ii) in the way that the Defendant Do sees the victim D (e.g., 40 years of age) with the Defendant’s sexual intercourse with that of the Defendant and the Defendant’s sexual behavior; and (iii) in the way that the Defendant Do sees the victim D’s sexual intercourse with that of the Defendant and the Defendant’s sexual behavior; and (iv) the victim D’s sexual conflict with that of the Defendant.