Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.

However, as to Defendant A, this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. The Defendant in violation of the Juvenile Protection Act, operating a sidewalk with the trade name “C” from around October 2013 to around October 2014, the Defendant is a news theater that, while introducing a female friendship, such as E (the age of 18), who is a juvenile, in entertainment bars, singing rooms, etc., such as “D,” in the vice-dong of Busan-dong, Busan-dong, thereby allowing the Defendant to provide entertainment services.

On September 27, 2014, at around 03:26, the Defendant: (a) received KRW 60,000 per hour from the “D” entertainment tavern located in Busan Jin-gu, Busan; (b) and (c) had the said E enjoying KRW 60,00 per hour, with G, a guest, etc., drinking alcohol, singing, etc., and allowed the customer to provide entertainment services.

As a result, the defendant assisted the juvenile's act of entertainment for profit.

B. The Defendant violated the Employment Security Act, without registering with the competent authority at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of Article 1, employed female employees, such as E, H, I, J, K, K, L, M, N, andO, as Dow, on the above “C” sidewalk, and then offered them to the proprietor of an entertainment drinking club business who is a business establishment harmful to juveniles and received KRW 10,000 per hour at the job placement cost.

2. Defendant B, from April 15, 2014, is a person who operates a “D” entertainment tavern, which is a juvenile harmful business establishment located in Busan Jin-gu, Busan.

The owner of a business establishment harmful to juveniles shall not employ juveniles.

Nevertheless, the Defendant employed juvenile E at the date, time, and place specified in paragraph 1(a).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Examination protocol of Defendant A by the prosecution;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of Defendant B concerning the police officer

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Article 56 of the Juvenile Protection Act and subparagraph 2 of Article 30 of the same Act, Article 47 subparagraph 1 of the same Article and Article 19 (1) of the Employment Security Act, Defendant B: Article 58 subparagraph 4 of the Juvenile Protection Act and Article 29 (1) of the same Act;

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;