1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 12,459,721 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and its related amount from May 1, 2014 to June 26, 2014.

Basic Facts

The plaintiff is a company that runs the business of importing and selling agricultural and fishery products, and the defendant is a company that runs the business of storing freezing and refrigerating.

On January 22, 2011, the Plaintiff imported a dry-gu line (dried Swetato) from China. Around that time, the Plaintiff entered into a custody contract with the Defendant (hereinafter “the first custody contract”) and entered into the said storage contract into on January 26, 2011, and entered the said dry-gu line into the storage room at 803 out of the Defendant’s warehouse located in Busan Yacheon-dong 344-1, Busan 34-1. The Plaintiff completed customs clearance on October 22, 2012, which is 21 months after the date of importation of the said dry-gu line, and entered into the storage contract at around 26, 2012, and the Plaintiff entered into a storage contract with the Defendant (hereinafter “the second storage contract”). The Plaintiff entered into the storage contract with the Defendant on October 22, 2012, and the second storage contract with the Defendant on December 1, 2012, and the second storage contract with the Defendant “the second storage contract”).

As of April 30, 2014, the sum of the unpaid amounts of storage fees under each storage contract of the Plaintiff as of April 30, 2014 is KRW 12,459,721, and the detailed unpaid details are as shown in the attached Table.

(Attachment Form 1, 2, 4, and 5 (including a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply) are written in the absence of dispute, and the plaintiff's principal claim as to the plaintiff's principal claim as to the claim for the main claim of the court below as a whole, although the defendant, as a warehouse, has a duty to keep the temperature of the air conditioning warehouse in an appropriate and regular manner in accordance with the first storage contract, the number of the air conditioning system, which the plaintiff suffered in violation of this duty to keep the warehouse clean, was reduced, and even if he had a duty to keep the warehouse clean, spawns were inhabited in the warehouse in violation of this duty to keep the warehouse clean.