1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The Forest Survey Division, prepared during the Japanese occupation occupation period, indicated that R, the address of which is the “Seoul-do Yangju-gun Q,” was 100 - 35 - (hereinafter “real estate before the instant subdivision”) of the Yangju-gun of Gyeonggi-do.

B. The land register and the real estate register regarding the real estate before the partition of the instant case

6. On December 31, 1966, the real estate before the instant subdivision was destroyed due to the disaster. On December 31, 1966, the real estate before the instant subdivision was converted into the Gyeonggi-do Yangju-gun P9,620 square meters (hereinafter “the instant real estate”). On December 31, 196, the real estate before the instant subdivision was converted into the Gyeonggi-do Yangju-gun P9,620 square meters (hereinafter “P9,620 square meters”) 40, U3, V 16, V 84, W 66, X 26, X 14,Y 18, Z14, Z14, 51, Z97, Z97, and was registered as the registration office of preservation of ownership of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “the instant real estate”). On the instant real estate by the Defendants, the Defendants, the registration office of preservation of ownership of the ownership of the instant real estate was completed by the Namyang-gun District Court No. 2097, Dec. 19, 20, 197.

C. On July 2, 1934, after the plaintiffs died on July 2, 193, both AC inherited the property solely by inheritance of Australia. On June 11, 1995, AC died on the death of June 11, 1995, the plaintiffs, their children, were succeeded to the property AC in their respective shares of 1/4.

AA, the fleet of the Defendants, died on April 8, 1990, and succeeded to the property of AD, Defendant E, F, G, H, I, J, and K, which are their children. Since then AD died on August 24, 1991, Defendant L, M, N, andO, their spouse, succeeded to the property of AD.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 12 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. According to the above findings of the determination on the cause of the claim, R registered as the owner of the real estate prior to the instant partition in the Forest Survey Division appears to be the plaintiffs' preference, so the content of the situation has been changed by the adjudication.