logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2015.07.03 2014가합2251
임대차보증금반환
Text

1.(a)

The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Plaintiff) is among the buildings listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table 1 building list from the Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant E.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed a principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant S is the first unit owner; Defendant T is the second unit; Defendant U is the third unit; Defendant V is the fourth unit owner.

(hereinafter collectively referred to as “each building of this case”). (b)

Defendant S, U, and V are relatives, and Defendant T is the seat of Defendant S.

C. Each of the instant buildings was completed on January 2007 and each of the registration of preservation of ownership was made in the name of the Defendants.

The appearance and structure of the four buildings are the same, and approximately 20 units for each building are partitioned into 80 room rooms in total, but there are not registration of partition.

The Defendants established a management office at the entrance of each of the instant buildings, and posted a large banner stating “lease, reservation, W building, X, grass option, and parking lot security”.

The above telephone number is Y.

E. From the end of April 2007 to April 2014, Y resided with her husband’s Z and infants in one of the instant respective units of buildings and has been in possession of the key to each unit of each building of this case, and has been in charge of management, such as cleaning, monthly rent and management expenses, and payment of all public charges. From the end of the instant building to the end of the instant building, Y entered into a lease contract on behalf of the Defendants.

F. The Plaintiffs, as indicated in the attached Table 3, enter into a lease agreement with respect to each of the parts on board each of the items of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 attached hereto (hereinafter “each of the parts on board of the instant case”, each of which is linked in sequence to each of the items of each of the instant drawings, and are residing until now (hereinafter “each of the instant lease agreements”).

G. On January 19, 2007, the Defendants engaged in the housing rental business after completing business registration (trade name: AA) with respect to the housing rental business under Defendant V’s name. Defendant V resided in No. 404 of the 4 Dong until February 2012 and managed the lease business, etc. of each of the instant buildings.

[Reasons for Recognition] A, Evidence Nos. 1 through 19, 22, 27, 30 through 33, Evidence Nos. 9 (including virtual numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), 20-2, A.

arrow