The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant maintains his livelihood with daily labor, and his body was in short of living costs due to his failure to work for a week during which he was in the AP, and the crime of this case was committed, there are some circumstances to take into account the circumstances. In light of the fact that the defendant is living for approximately three months of detention, and the defendant is breaking his mistake in depth through his daily life for three months of detention, and is endeavoring to reach an agreement with the victim, the imprisonment (eight months) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant committed the instant crime, which constitutes a repeated crime, even before six months have passed since he/she was discharged from prison due to the crime of indecent act by compulsion.

There is no action to recover damage up to the trial court.

In addition, considering the various circumstances asserted by the Defendant as the grounds for appeal, the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable, even if it is considered that the Defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable, considering the following factors: the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the crime in this case as well as favorable or unfavorable circumstances.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.