The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment and six months) of the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant agreed with the victim that the agreement of the victim was submitted is favorable.

However, the crime of this case is deemed to have caused considerable damage to the victim by spreading the victim's upper half of the body shock of the victim where the defendant was sitting a hot water in prison workers' room shock for about 6 weeks, and by using the images of the 15% heart 2 degrees, including the inner part where treatment is required for about 15 weeks, such as visual 2 degrees of image and 3 weeks, and the video of the gate. The crime of this case seems to have occurred due to the crime of this case. The crime of this case is deemed to have occurred considerable pain. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Supreme Court sentencing guidelines established by the Sentencing Commission, the first category of the crime of general bodily injury (general injury), the special person (a serious injury: the number of severe injury, the mitigation factor: the reduction factor: the reduction factor): the decision in the recommended area; the sentencing range (amid June to 2), the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing against the defendant is unreasonable and unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.