All of the appeals filed by the prosecutor and the defendant A are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court’s sentence against the Defendants by the prosecutor (a fine of one million won is imposed on Defendant A, a year of imprisonment, and a fine of one million won is imposed on Defendant B) is too uneased and unreasonable.

B. Defendant A 1) The Defendant, as a matter of fact, did not threaten police officers on the ground that he saw the improvement of his hand in order to open a brue, which had been lightd at the time of committing the crime, and that he told a reporter to do so, and that he saws the improvement or throw away near the police officers in the direction of the police officer.

2) The lower court’s sentence against the wrongful Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to Defendant A’s assertion of misunderstanding of facts, the lower court rejected Defendant’s assertion on the aforementioned purport by explaining detailed circumstances in the 6th 18th 18 or 9th 18th 18th of the judgment.

2) We affirm the judgment of the court below in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the court below, closely examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below, and considering the following circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence, we affirm the judgment of the court below.

According to CCTV images taken at the time of crime, the defendant seems to have used the improvement in order to open the two cases where the defendant had a light that he had loaded in the initial vehicle.

However, the Defendant, by opening a reconuted part of the vehicle and laying off the light over the vehicle after being scattered around the vehicle.

른 손에 낫을 쥔 채 피켓을 양손으로 들고 시위를 시작하였는데, 피고인의 주장과 같이 단지 볍씨가 든 자루를 열기 위한 목적이었다면 그 자루를 여는 행위가 끝난 뒤 낫을 내려놓는 것이 자연스럽고, 피켓을 양손으로 들면서 굳이 낫까지 함께 드는 불편한 자세를 취할 만한 이유가 없다.

O is not correct in the trial court, but it is not accurate whether it is from L or from M HWW.