logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원통영지원 2020.10.29 2019가합10244
조합원부담금 청구
Text

The part of the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Plaintiff), C, and E’s claim for non-existence of membership is dismissed.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

Facts of recognition

The Plaintiff entered into a partnership agreement is a housing association established to build an apartment of a regional housing association in the whole area of the Z area in the city of the Z and sell it to its members (hereinafter “instant project”). On February 14, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for authorization to establish a housing association with the macro-si Mayor on April 28, 2015.

The Defendants entered into each of the following agreements on joining an association (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant agreements on joining an association”) with the content that they will purchase one household unit of an apartment unit of a regional housing association to be newly constructed with the Plaintiff:

In the case of Defendant T, E, and Y on the date of joining the Plaintiff, the above date is the date of succession to the rights and obligations under the contract of transfer of membership.

The AF 1F 256,100,000 G 2 G 84B 250,600, 300 H 3 H 84A 250,600 on April 2014, AC 84A 250,600,000 for AD 74 180,10,000 on May 2015 J 84A 250,60,600, 006 B 107, 2000 on June 25, 2014, Defendant 207: (a) was not submitted around 195,000,000 AF 74 195,000,007 C 70,000 on November 11, 2016, 2016, 10, 205, 16, or 15,06.

-- - On October 30, 2014, AM 59 149,800,00 15 R 74 217,200,00 16 S 186,000 T 17 T 17 December 30, 2015, the total amount of AP 74 190,200,000 AP 174 190,200,000 AP 184 20,00 AP 184 20,00 AM 204 20,000 AM 204 18,204 20,00 AM 184 20,00 AM 214 20,000 AM 214 20,205 AM 2014 201, AM 2014

arrow