1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s relationship 1) The Plaintiff is the deceased B (C.C., hereinafter “the deceased”).

2) The Plaintiff, after having divorced with his wife, her wife D and deceased (hereinafter “the deceased”) who were married, had no time to look at the deceased’s work relationship. On February 1, 2007, the Plaintiff: (a) on the part of F, who operated the “E Child Care Center” located in Ulsan and F, who actually operated the said Child Care Center, and the husband G of F, who operated the said Child Care Center; (b) on ordinary day, 24 hours of infant care; and (c) on the part of the week, entrusted the Plaintiff with infant care for the deceased’s siblings in the form of bringing the deceased’s house.

B. Although child care institutions and the deceased’s death 1) had an extended time care teacher for 24 hours, F did not have an extended time care teacher. From July 2006 to April 2007, F prepared a false application as if he were to work as a child care teacher for the deceased, and received 6,346,000 won subsidies during the above period as if he had already retired infant care teacher for a time extension period from February 2007 to May 207, F received 4 million won in total from 100,000 won for the deceased’s infant care teacher and received 4,000,000 won subsidies for the deceased’s infant care teacher’s care teacher’s care teacher’s care teacher’s care teacher’s care teacher’s care teacher’s care teacher’s care teacher’s care teacher’s care teacher’s care teacher’s care teacher’s care teacher’s care teacher’s care teacher’s care teacher’s care teacher’s care teacher’s care teacher’s care teacher’s care teacher’s care.

(b) the status;