Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

On November 11, 2018, at around 01:25, the Defendant driven the above taxi and driven the front road of the 187-month Seo-gu, Seoggu, Daegu, pursuant to one-lanes between the two-lanes from the four-lane boundary of the Sung City market to the two-lane park distance.

Since there is a limited speed of 60 km at a speed, a person engaged in driving duties has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating steering steering gear and brakes by complying with the restricted speed and properly seeing the right and the right and the right.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting this and driving a restricted speed exceeding 35 km, and at that time, the Defendant was placed on the right side from the left side of the said taxi to the side side of the bridge of the victim C(50 years of age) crossing the crosswalk crossing on the pedestrian color signal, and received the front part of the said taxi.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to such occupational negligence by cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral typosis and dysposis in an open hospital located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, where the victim was under the follow-up treatment at around 01:52 on November 11, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. A corpse of corpse;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the actual survey report, the notification of the results of traffic accident analysis, the license ledger, the tea inquiry, the mandatory insurance, and the investigation report;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and selection of

1. Article 62(1) of the suspended execution of the Criminal Act provides that the Defendant would not repeat the instant crime again, and that at the time of the accident, the victim appears to have been at the time of the accident due to considerable negligence in the occurrence of the instant accident or the expansion of damage, that the Defendant paid a considerable amount of agreement and agreed smoothly with the bereaved family members of the victim, and that the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle will have